mitch
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by mitch on Dec 29, 2022 21:50:59 GMT -5
Ok, so this is definitely a post I never thought I'd be writing. But here goes: what are folks' thoughts about using a 22-cal bullet on a moose?
Now, hear me out, there's some nuance here. My gun is a 22-250 Ackley Improved with a 28in barrel, shooting Barnes 78gr TSX (solid copper) going 3425fps. The last couple of years I've been using it on deer with really impressive results. Now, it isn't really my first choice for moose. I'm putting in for the draw next year (SK, Canada), and was thinking I'd have to use my wife's 6.5 Creedmoor and shoot a 120gr Barnes TSX. 6.5mm guns have been used on "Eurasian Elk" (aka moose) by European hunters for many decades, and a Barnes copper bullet is probably substantially better than what they had for most of that time. So I was decently happy with that plan.
Where the wrinkle comes in is when I got curious last night and compared the 6.5mm bullet to the 22-cal.
22-250AI 6.5CM 78gr TSX 120gr TSX 3425fps (chrono'd) 2750fps (est. 20" barrel) ME = 2,032ft-lb ME = 2,015ft-lb SD = 0.222 SD = 0.246 BC = 0.383 BC = 0.381 Momentum= 38lb-s Momentum = 47lb-s
The 6.5CM would have a larger frontal area when it expands (Barnes TSX does a really nice job of opening up wide and holding together), and carries more momentum. Other than that they are nearly identical in energy, BC, and sectional density.
So, what are people's thoughts - better yet - experience? Has anyone tried a high-powered 0.224 cartridge with a modern high-quality bullet on something bigger than a deer?
(Please remember this is a place to have open and friendly discussions about things :-). I'm not saying I'm going to try it or that I'm even comfortable with the idea at this point)
|
|
|
Post by joelmoney on Dec 29, 2022 22:01:54 GMT -5
Why under gun yourself? I don’t even like shooting whitetails in MN a 7mm mag. Will It kill a deer? CERTAINLY will. I like a little room for err.
What twist are you running to stabilize a 78gr monolithic?
|
|
mitch
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by mitch on Dec 29, 2022 22:44:13 GMT -5
I have a 1:7 twist Krieger, stabilizes those 78 coppers no problem :-)
My target load these days is a 95SMK, but when I was load-testing a couple years ago I went a little silly with some H1000 and got 90gr Berger VLDs over 3,400fps and blew them up in midair from the rpm’s haha
|
|
|
Post by joelmoney on Dec 29, 2022 23:54:36 GMT -5
I have a 1:7 twist Krieger, stabilizes those 78 coppers no problem :-) My target load these days is a 95SMK, but when I was load-testing a couple years ago I went a little silly with some H1000 and got 90gr Berger VLDs over 3,400fps and blew them up in midair from the rpm’s haha I actually thought it would take a little faster than 1:7. Thanks for the info. I remember 80 SMK’s being heavy. I guess I need to keep up on new trends. Thanks for the input. I like as big of an exit as I can get when things go wrong. Plenty of deer shot yearly with 50-55 gr monolithics in 223 REM.
|
|
mitch
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by mitch on Dec 30, 2022 0:23:52 GMT -5
Sure thing bud. I love the .224 diameter; with a decent amount of powder behind it it can perform pretty nicely. My 95SMK has a 0.6G1 BC; not quite top of the line anymore compared to some of the newer 6.5, 7, and 30-cal heavies out there, but still impressively flat and wind-resistant when it flies 3050fps out of the barrel. Love the fast-twist 22-250AI for targets and good on deer (last year took a big mule at 350yd, one shot through the boiler room), just not sure if it is ethical enough for something bigger…
|
|
|
Post by joelmoney on Dec 30, 2022 13:52:08 GMT -5
Ethics are so personal. I wouldn’t want to impose my ethics on someone else. Willing to share how I look at it. Not willing to say that’s how someone else needs to look at it. The more I have thought about shooting big game with smaller caliber rifles has been the more open the smaller I am willing to go. If I can watch the deer fall a half mile away I would be more likely to use something I might call marginal. If I’m in heavy brush for miles I would reach for my 35. Confidence chance of bullet deflection odds for follow up shot are some of the factors that sway my reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by Ice on Dec 31, 2022 9:26:49 GMT -5
Probably been more game killed with a less-than-modern .22 than any other caliber🤣!
|
|
|
Post by hillbill on Dec 31, 2022 9:52:44 GMT -5
back several years ago I fixed up an AR for Sasquatch, put an 8 twist barrel on it loaded the little .223 and the 70 grn TSX, he killed his first deer with it when he was 6 and several after, great bullet but IMO too small diameter. It killed fine but the blood trails were lacking in most cases even though they were pass thru.
I know you are pushing them much faster which makes a difference but for moose? I'd pick the 6.5 with the Barnes all day long. Would the .224 Barnes kill? Yep, without a doubt but for an animal as thick as a draft horse larger holes are in order.
|
|
|
Post by gd357 on Dec 31, 2022 13:15:17 GMT -5
IF your only 2 options are 22-250AI and the 6.5 CM, then I'd use the 6.5 (with some trepidation...). Shoot the heaviest well-constructed bullet you can find that will shoot accurately. If you have bigger options, use one of those.
I've never killed a moose. I have a half dozen friends who have. They used 7mm mag (160 gr partitions), 30-06, 300 Win Mag, and 300 WBY (180 gr partitions for the 30s). If you're willing to pick your shot angle and pass up anything that isn't PERFECT and REALLY CLOSE, you can kill darn near anything with small caliber guns. I believe in the school of thought that says "There's no replacement for displacement". Why eat tag soup because you can't take a shot that would be perfectly acceptable with a bigger gun?
JMHO gd
FWIW, with the right bullet the 6.5 will work.
|
|
klook
Junior Member

Posts: 67
|
Post by klook on Jan 14, 2023 9:36:41 GMT -5
The 6.5 is an underpowered .270 Win. Many moose have been taken with a .270. But many animals have been lost with a .270 because of ignorant or unskilled hunters. It was learned fairly quickly that the .270 Win is not a good gun for unskilled hunters or poor shooters(youths) when they started the moose hunts in Maine. The most unethical of them would drive away if the moose did not fall down, it was to hard to recover them far from the road. Make a good shot, be prepared to track and recover it, and use the heaviest bullet you can. As a side note, I own 2 .270 Win's and would use them on moose. But I would not take a shot that hit large bones. If that's all I got for a shot, I would not get a moose. On another side note, my Hankin's SML Scout is by far the most powerful gun I own and it would most likely go moose hunting with me.
Timely article in the January Rifleman magazine. Don't read much anymore, picked it up and there was an article about the .270 Win. It mentions the 6.5 Creedmore and other competitors of the .270 I agree 100% with what is written in the article.
|
|
|
Post by saskquach on Jan 18, 2023 0:50:28 GMT -5
Its been a long time coming for us to use 22 cal centre fires for hunting, then at the same time they outlaw the 44-40 win as inadequate for hunting... go figure.
Many years ago I used to load 7 rem with 120gr barnes xbt over 3400fps. Under 100yds the petals would come off and go in 4 different directions but the core would punch on thru. Was devastating on whitetails and mulies. My buddy had an opportunity to go for moose. I told him NOT to use that load for moose, use the 160 gr partitions I loaded for him. Guess what? Huge bull under 100 yards in the willows and he hits it square in the shoulder knuckle with that 120gr bullet. He proceeded to shoot it several times in the head to finish it. He gifted me THAT shoulder so I would have some meat. The bottom half of it was bone chips and bloodshot so bad it was beyond saving. There was only one small hole that made it into the chest cavity. He wasnt sure if it was part of the bullet or a piece of bone. I never reloaded ammo for him after that and come to think of it we have never hunted together since. I guess what I am trying to get at is use a bullet that is constructed to break big bones. The 22 cal centre fires will kill a moose, first nations have done it with 22l.r., but you have to be sure of your shot placement. I have been drawn for moose in the Saskatoon management zone and have used a T.C. Impact with 290 Barnes and a Savage mlII using 325gr ftx with great results. I hope to get drawn there next year and I will be using 175gr Barnes tsx in my 7mm sml.
Dean
|
|
|
Post by 71yella2 on Jan 18, 2023 12:52:03 GMT -5
7mm smokeless?
|
|
|
Post by saskquach on Jan 19, 2023 1:36:44 GMT -5
Yes a 7mm sml. So as not to derail this thread I will post some info at a later date. A quick note- the Barnes 175 tsx is movin along at 3180fps...
|
|
|
Post by Chad on Jan 22, 2023 7:21:27 GMT -5
Why under gun yourself??? Maybe or maybe not. During deer rifle season here a couple years ago a guy I know shot a very nice 10 pointer with a 338 RUM and the deer was never found. I feel like sometimes hunters get the mindset if I carry a big enough caliber if it’s brown it’s down and that’s not always the case. What I’m trying to point out is many calibers will work that may get overlooked because the thought of being under gunned but if you make good shots and put it where it counts will do the job just fine.
|
|
|
Post by fatfred on Jan 23, 2023 19:01:15 GMT -5
There is something about threads like this that I really like. Never any 100% true answers. I have always been a fan of someone who can use a very marginal caliber to succeed at a high level. Not everyone has the skill and patience to make that work out. At it's most simplistic, we can have 100% success in dropping a 1 ton cow/bull with a .22 LR. The animal is positioned, the shooter has done this 1000 times and the spot to hit is known intimately. Or a .375 Win mag on a whitetail that is running, moving, etc that escapes with a bad wound. It is all about the shot placement. When hunting the variables are infinite. 1) animals position 2) Bullet being used 3) hunters skill to recognize a certain opportunity/angle 4) ground conditions. snow, rain, darkness 5) distance 6) confidence in equipment and ability 7) hunters understanding of anatomy 8) the actual intended target. brain, heart, lungs, spine, bone structure 9) The ability to "know" you will hit the right spot that will work based on your equipment. The targets and spots are limited with a sub bore.
So, if you want to drop a moose stone cold with a 22-250 Ackly IMP with the load you mentioned, I would say a knowledge of where the brain lies, a clear pathway to it, a still animal, at a range you can deliver the shot with 100% confidence and you'll be OKAY. However, if you anticipate all situations such as shot presentation, range, bad weather, terrible recovery terrain, and impending darkness you want to consider your weapon and load more carefully. You may be on a hunt of a lifetime that comes down to the last day. Or you may be hunting on your home turf with many, many days to get your deer(s), elk or moose. You may be able to snipe carefully or you may have time running out and the bull of a life time gives you a 5 second chance shot, quartering to you right at dark at 250 yds and not have a super solid bench rest but a good enough rest to hit a 10" zone. If this happens I want a bone crusher. It could be a SML with a stout bullet moving right along. Or, a .338 Win Mag or .375 Mag loaded with copper or partitions. These give you a solution for anything that comes up in the variables above.
Like others have said, I will not dictate what you or anyone should do. Only discuss thoughts and reasons for what I believe based on my experience and thoughts on the matter. I will say that a skilled rifleman with a strong ethical mindset and highly capable gun will kill more game of any size with a 22-250 than your average Joe using a big gun all day long. That same skilled hunter who will never fail himself with a 22-250 will also increase his odds of having more opportunities to shoot effectively with more gun. On a hunt of a lifetime? A guide may not even allow the .22 cal.
If you were a goose hunter or a turkey hunter and you thought you were 100% sure of an ethical kill and DRT results AND you used a .410, you would probably never shoot over 20 yds. Yet if you had a 10 gauge and the same mentality, you would think nothing of a 40+ yd shot.
Just thoughts from an old head
|
|
|
Post by saskquach on Mar 8, 2023 19:22:09 GMT -5
Here is a link to a recent Ron Spomer discussion on big game hunting with a 22 cal, specifically 220 swift...
|
|
mitch
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by mitch on Mar 8, 2023 19:28:37 GMT -5
I’ll check it out, thanks!
|
|
|
Post by joelmoney on Mar 9, 2023 14:34:44 GMT -5
Mitch here is a link to a podcast with Dr. Ed Ashby on Barnes bullets. Talks about twist rate and effects. I have seen definite rotational damage done shooting 1-7” 300 blackout. This is a good listen but Barnes stuff starts at about 12min. Around 25mim he starts talking arrows. podbay.fm/p/live-to-hunt-and-fish-podcastEpisode 34
|
|
mitch
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by mitch on Mar 11, 2023 20:10:00 GMT -5
Sweet thanks Joel I’ll check it out. Got it downloaded now just need to give it a listen :-)
|
|
|
Post by joelmoney on Mar 12, 2023 1:19:57 GMT -5
His youth rifle for zebra was a 22 Hornet.
|
|