Sloppy_Snood
New Member
Preparing for the end... of 2017
Posts: 40
|
Post by Sloppy_Snood on Dec 6, 2017 14:36:17 GMT -5
Looks like a significant percentage of SML shooter are using standard center fire rifle barrels with standard rifling groove depths of .007"-.008".
Why not have shallower groove depth on the order of .0035" for less "required" bullet base obturation required for rifling engagement with copper-jacketed bullets?
|
|
|
Post by hillbill on Dec 6, 2017 15:23:10 GMT -5
The main reason is being able to use existing internal dimensions from the barrel manufacturers, we are doing good to get them to build standard bore sizes in todays economy. doing special tooling is not on their radar.
the bores we use now work very very well, I'm not so sure shallow grooves are going to improve on what is already out there.
I have never had a problem getting bullets to obturate or to shoot accurately from any of the custom barrels I have used which is well over 100, some better than others but I don't see obturation as a problem?
What I do see as a benefit is narrow lands; just one opinion but when you think about it it's less metal to displace and from what i have seen from narrow groove barrels so far i am a believer, Again, JMO
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Dec 6, 2017 16:33:11 GMT -5
I agree with Bill. Narrow land barrels are performing very well. Less metal is displaced full forming with narrow lands. It just makes sense that this same displacement takes place during bullet obturation on smooth formed bullets as well.
Thick jacketed bullets might benefit from a close difference in measurement between the bore and groove diameter.
|
|
|
Post by dannoboone on Dec 6, 2017 17:05:40 GMT -5
Looks like a significant percentage of SML shooter are using standard center fire rifle barrels with standard rifling groove depths of .007"-.008".
Why not have shallower groove depth on the order of .0035" for less "required" bullet base obturation required for rifling engagement with copper-jacketed bullets?
Why "fix" what ain't broke? Some of these guys are regularly getting less than 1/2 MOA accuracy with the available barrels. Many of us have CF's less accurate than our ML's. Bullets have improved so much that we have, in effect, very accurate center fires minus the brass. K.I.S.S.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Dec 6, 2017 17:24:10 GMT -5
Looks like a significant percentage of SML shooter are using standard center fire rifle barrels with standard rifling groove depths of .007"-.008".
Why not have shallower groove depth on the order of .0035" for less "required" bullet base obturation required for rifling engagement with copper-jacketed bullets?
I don’t know of a barrel manufacturer that goes that deep on grooves. A barrel with grooves .007” to .008” deep is unknown to me. My Krieger barrel is a .450/.458 , .004” deep grooves. My .40 cal Rock Creek is .401/.408, .0035” deep grooves.
|
|
|
Post by hillbill on Dec 6, 2017 17:34:40 GMT -5
I agree completely with danno but there is one way to find out? If you can talk someone into building such a barrel hang it on an action and find out what it does, trying new ideas has always been the hallmark of this SML game from the beginning. I have played Guinea pig many times in the last 10 years, it's your turn if someone will drill and rifle it for you.
|
|
|
Post by elkman1310 on Dec 6, 2017 18:56:25 GMT -5
The industry standard is .004 I doubt if there would be a benefit to a land and groove that deep except for black powder and maybe paper patch. I have used all the major brands to build muzzleloaders except Krieger. I have used Krieger for many years for my comp guns but for a muzzleloader as long as the barrel is the same size from the muzzle to the breech plug with no loose or tight spots it doesn't matter if it is a cut rifle barrel or a button rifle barrel the gun will shot bug holes if it is assembled properly. I have used both types many times and there is no accuracy difference between them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2017 19:38:52 GMT -5
I've thought about shallow grooves myself. For land riders, I think there would be gains to be had, especially in the sealing of gas pressures behind the projectile. Narrow lands are a must as they make obturation easier to accomplish.
I have 2 Barnes 250 TEZ projectiles that I captured in a jug test. Both were sized as land riders and both only have faint lines on their bearing surface from the lands. There is no easily measurable engravement that I can detect even with a fingernail. This tells me that while they may obturate a miniscule amount upon firing, it is not enough to be retained or cause engravement that can be confirmed. In this scenario, a shallow groove would likely be an advantage.
How much a land riding jacketed projectile actually obturates into the rifling, we really cannot be sure of. I doubt that it fully obturates to completely fill the bore as in a centerfire rifle. Shallow grooves might be an advantage there too.
For full form bullets, there may not be an advantage other that having less jacket disruption and moving of jacket metal material which weakens the jacket.
There are some things that must be considered. 1) If drilled For land riders, retaining the same .450 diameter final sized projectile, the grooves would be shallower which makes it difficult to full form .458 projectiles. This would limit available projectiles. 2) If the overall ID of the barrel is set up for .458 full form projectiles, the bore would be drilled .454 which would eliminate any projectile smaller than that to be used as a land rider. Either way, you would be getting into a niche.....To gain what?
Maybe Jeff will start making custom barrels. Call it "Licking River Custom Barrels"
|
|
Sloppy_Snood
New Member
Preparing for the end... of 2017
Posts: 40
|
Post by Sloppy_Snood on Dec 7, 2017 8:52:46 GMT -5
Sorry Kyle... I had land and groove bore diameter on the brain.
I meant to say standard groove rifling with 0.004" and reduce that to something on the order of 0.002".
I was really eluding to better bullet obturation into a shallower .002" groove as scat has stated (better gas sealing, possible increase in velocity). Obviously, a full-form sized bullet would pretty much eliminate the need for this BUT the bullet will have additional frictional drag on the jacket in a deeper groove.
On the subject of cut rifling depth, variation is groove depth is not a new tooling proposition. Cutters can be shortened (height) by a variety of means to create shallow cuts. More of a setup operation. Button rifling.. well yes, the button head would need to possess shorter engraving protrusions so there would indeed be tooling modification there.
|
|
|
Post by hillbill on Dec 7, 2017 9:11:25 GMT -5
the Rock Creek barrels shoot very well indeed, we already know that but their grooves are only half a thou shallower than normal.
I really don't think the slightly shallower grooves attribute to their top notch barrels But I do think the narrow land 8 groove profile does help.
every barrel of theirs I have used so far (3) have spun very true after being cut to length, you can't say that about a lot of barrels, even the high end barrels. That tells me the ones I have are drilled very straight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2017 9:22:56 GMT -5
Bestill has already gone down this road guys...He has a .450/.457 kreiger i believe...I thought about this idea a year or so ago,but Jeff/Bestill had already ordered the barrel...Any barrel maker that cuts rifling can easily make one because it is less passes/cuts they have to perform on the barrel....Maybe Bestill will chime in on his results....
|
|
|
Post by Hank on Dec 7, 2017 9:58:44 GMT -5
Maybe Jeff will start making custom barrels. Call it "Licking River Custom Barrels" [/quote]
Jeff can't keep up making Custom Muzzle loaders,,,, no way am I going to start making custom barrels, I will leave that to the experts...
|
|
Sloppy_Snood
New Member
Preparing for the end... of 2017
Posts: 40
|
Post by Sloppy_Snood on Dec 7, 2017 10:45:29 GMT -5
the Rock Creek barrels shoot very well indeed, we already know that but their grooves are only half a thou shallower than normal. I really don't think the slightly shallower grooves attribute to their top notch barrels But I do think the narrow land 8 groove profile does help. every barrel of theirs I have used so far (3) have spun very true after being cut to length, you can't say that about a lot of barrels, even the high end barrels. That tells me the ones I have are drilled very straight. Thanks for the reply hillbill. Obviously, RC barrels are top notch.
On the subject of gundrilling, I can explain how a local Indiana gundrilling company actually performs the operation and what to expect in terms of barrel straightness.
During a competition shotgun barrel building project I completed in 2013, I used a dedicated gundrilling company named Davis Machine & Tool in Edinburg, IN to drill out four 41L40 1 1/2" round bars (36" in length) for me (.726"). The owner was very nice and allowed me to watch the actual drilling of one of my barrel blanks (very cool to watch I might add). After one of the barrel blanks was drilled, I inquired as to what kept the drill bit directly in the center of the blank for the entire length of the blank? I was surprised at the answer: The drill bit DOES NOT stay in the center of the blank as it drills its way to the other end.
It was explained to me that this is quite normal for gundrilling operations. More specifically, the driller told me that after the entire 3"-4" length of the drilling head is into the metal of the blank, the drill bit can "walk" in whatever direction it chooses. Interestingly, the bit "walks" in one direction the entire length of the blank. Further, it was explained that it is typical for the bit can walk (i.e. drift) off of the blank's centerline by .001" for every linear inch of barrel blank!
So for my 36" long .726" bore barrel blanks, the hole on the other end of the barrel could be up to .032" off of the centerline of the blank!! This sounds like a problem but , in reality, it isn't (provided that you oversize your barrel blank to start with). My four 36" barrel blanks varied in amount of gundrill bit drift from .014" to .022" off of the blank's actual centerline.
So why no big deal? Again, oversized blanks for this project "save the day" but DO require a post-gundrilling operation: turning the barrel blank on centers in a lathe. In essence, cut the exterior of the barrel to match centerline of the drilled (and honed) hole in the blank. Obviously, turning on centers is best accomplished AFTER honing the bore to uniformity. (there ARE OTHER TECHNIQUES that can be used to the same effect but what is in this post is what I observed firsthand).
I understand that each barrel manufacturing shop has there own methods, ways, and secrets for claiming their barrels are superior to the next guy's... that's normal marketing (and may be true in some cases). What is never really published on websites in literature is the finer details of how the manufacturer ensures that the barrel bore is concentric with the bore. Some accomplish this via turning the outside of the barrel concentric to the centerline of the bore after gundrilling and honing while others use "straightening machines" that effectively bend the blank straight within a tolerance range. Probably other techniques too but I tend to gravitate towards machining (less stress on the metal itself).
|
|
|
Post by GMB54-120 on Dec 7, 2017 11:52:31 GMT -5
Bestill has already gone down this road guys...He has a .450/.457 kreiger i believe...I thought about this idea a year or so ago,but Jeff/Bestill had already ordered the barrel...Any barrel maker that cuts rifling can easily make one because it is less passes/cuts they have to perform on the barrel....Maybe Bestill will chime in on his results.... I thought he had them cut a .450x.456 but i really don't remember exactly. Doc White used a shallower groove design in all his ML barrels. IIRC it was .030-.035 too. He used lots of Criterion barrels and a couple others. They made him these shallow groove barrels in both a .451x.458 and a .410x.416 as well as a .504.
|
|
snook
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by snook on Dec 7, 2017 13:30:27 GMT -5
Maybe Jeff will start making custom barrels. Call it "Licking River Custom Barrels" Jeff can't keep up making Custom Muzzle loaders,,,, no way am I going to start making custom barrels, I will leave that to the experts... [/quote] Lol... I’ll bet! Your Muzzleloader’s and work are top notch!
|
|
Sloppy_Snood
New Member
Preparing for the end... of 2017
Posts: 40
|
Post by Sloppy_Snood on Dec 7, 2017 15:28:20 GMT -5
I thought he had them cut a .450x.456 but i really don't remember exactly. Doc White used a shallower groove design in all his ML barrels. IIRC it was .030-.035 too. He used lots of Criterion barrels and a couple others. They made him these shallow groove barrels in both a .451x.458 and a .410x.416 as well as a .504. Doc White used Clerke and Wilson barrels prior to using Criterion. The muzzle crowns are a dead give away.
|
|
|
Post by hillbill on Dec 7, 2017 17:36:00 GMT -5
I'm not saying shallow grooves wouldn't work but would it be an improvement? seeing is believing...
|
|
|
Post by jims on Dec 7, 2017 20:50:31 GMT -5
Did not Marlin once promote microgroove barrels years ago.
|
|
|
Post by bestill458 on Dec 7, 2017 22:35:58 GMT -5
Bestill has already gone down this road guys...He has a .450/.457 kreiger i believe...I thought about this idea a year or so ago,but Jeff/Bestill had already ordered the barrel...Any barrel maker that cuts rifling can easily make one because it is less passes/cuts they have to perform on the barrel....Maybe Bestill will chime in on his results.... I had krieger make 3 barrels couple years ago .450/.456 They shot great but were they better than standard .450/.458 i found no difference. Now i personally feel the narrower land 8R rifling from rock creek is beneficial especially smooth form.
|
|
|
Post by schunter on Dec 8, 2017 9:12:33 GMT -5
Bestill has already gone down this road guys...He has a .450/.457 kreiger i believe...I thought about this idea a year or so ago,but Jeff/Bestill had already ordered the barrel...Any barrel maker that cuts rifling can easily make one because it is less passes/cuts they have to perform on the barrel....Maybe Bestill will chime in on his results.... I had krieger make 3 barrels couple years ago .450/.456 They shot great but were they better than standard .450/.458 i found no difference. Now i personally feel the narrower land 8R rifling from rock creek is beneficial especially smooth form. Beneficial for BH209 and smokeless?
|
|