|
Post by hawghunter on Feb 18, 2016 9:32:33 GMT -5
I think that Apple is doing the right thing. I applaud their management for taking a stand.
|
|
|
Post by itneverends22 on Feb 18, 2016 9:37:34 GMT -5
I think that Apple is doing the right thing. I applaud their management for taking a stand. I agree..
|
|
153
Junior Member
Posts: 59
|
Post by 153 on Feb 18, 2016 13:19:04 GMT -5
X3. I hope Apple tell the gov to pound sand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 13:49:09 GMT -5
Has anyone went to the trouble of doing this:
"iPhone users have the option to set a security feature that only allows a certain number of tries to guess the correct passcode to unlock the phone before all the data on the iPhone is deleted. It's a security measure Apple put in place to keep important data out of the wrong hands."
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 18, 2016 16:00:51 GMT -5
From a law enforcement point of view it sucks! They stand to gain a lot of good information off that phone that could save lives. They are only looking to get the information from THAT phone as specified by the court order. Much the same as when a search warrant is obtained for a specific area..........say it just for a garage on the property..........than an evidence obtained anywhere else on the premises is what is knows as the "fruit of the poison pen!" and not admissible. I know where you are coming from but saving lives TRUMPS the other alternatives. We live in a time of terrorist attacks and sometimes you need to fight fire with fire and maybe even add a little gas!
|
|
beans
Full Member
Posts: 248
|
Post by beans on Feb 18, 2016 18:02:34 GMT -5
I am on the fence on this.
I want to see what's on that phone. It could be a great find to help keep others safe. I would also bet that many hacks would love to see some "back-door" software be developed, that when finally leaked or stolen, that could help the hacks hack into an unhackable phone that Mr & Mrs smith bought to have "total" confidence that their personal information was 100% protected. 100% protection is unheard of anymore.
That's the double edge sword we live by. Same as the NSA recording every call and text made by everyone. Is that right or wrong? I don't like it and I even tone down things I want to say to people that could be taken the wrong way by an "eavesdropper". It suppresses my freedom of speech in a way. At least a smart persons freedom of speech. Who wants someone knocking at, or kicking down your door because you made a very off color remark about the president? Or made many highly critical texts or had conversations about the gov't?
Bottom line? We are supposed to be a free country. Un-encumbered by the threat of saying whatever we want about anyone we want. Good people with no bad intentions should be able to rant about anything. The downside is not being able to see something that might really be obvious and noteworthy of attention.
What is the answer? I do not know. I will say that the good guys should carry at all times. Good guys that see, hear and sense things should report them more often.
Tough world we live in and it's not easy to say what is the right thing to do.
|
|
|
Post by itneverends22 on Feb 18, 2016 18:40:51 GMT -5
well said beans..
|
|
|
Post by rojo23 on Feb 18, 2016 20:41:45 GMT -5
I am not a fan of people in my personal business, but I don't have anything to hide. The information on that phone could possibly prevent another attack, or save lives then Apple should get the data for the FBI. As Richard said, the letter of the law can bite the good guys in the but from time to time. You would think our government would have better hackers that could break the security on an phone.
|
|
|
Post by ultimatesml on Feb 18, 2016 22:01:55 GMT -5
The best hackers would never work for our government and Apple adding a back door is to assure that every individuals information will never be secure. Apple/Macs have the best security and the reason antivirus software is not necessary for those devices. There built in security is better than anything you can buy.
Personally it doesn't matter to me whether I have anything to hide or not. I do not like the double talk of authority making statements of "if you have nothing to hide, you wouldn't care" that is a bullying tactic!
I Know it is taken out of context as to how it was intended, when ole Ben said it but I still like the words...
"Those who give up Liberty for the sense of security, deserve neither!"
How about we secure our borders and do a better job vetting "refugees" or any foreigner for that matter, before allowing them to just come in and maybe we would need to police our own a little less.
|
|
|
Post by dannoboone on Feb 19, 2016 13:35:16 GMT -5
Like Beans, I'm on the fence concerning this.
Upon hearing about the court order and Apple's fight against it, I wondered why the FBI didn't go about it differently, and later heard that others wondered the same thing. Why didn't/don't they just get an order for an agent supervised method of Apple personnel work to unlock the phone? The FBI could get their information and Apple could keep the I-phone security in tact? Everyone then should be happy, right? Probably not......
The I-phone has become a favorite of "bad guys" (and gals) all over the world because of its functions AND security. All the "good guys" fighting the "bad guys" would love having a program to unlock the phones' security codes! The FBI would get intense pressure to "share" such a program, and sooner or later it would be shared. Sooner or later the hackers would get their hands on such a program, and security would be lost. Agreed. Build the darned wall as was promised to Reagan in the '80's! Cut all federal funding (our tax dollars) supporting the illegals.....many would just leave. No need for another billions of dollars govt program to round up illegals...just deport them when they are found by local LE's.
Other than outrageous government regulations, the illegals are the greatest drain on our economy, and they are becoming a serious threat to our security, almost as great as our present POTUS.
|
|
|
Post by motox369 on Feb 19, 2016 15:16:09 GMT -5
When we give up our liberties in the name of security or preventing another attack we have already been dealt a much sharper blow than a terrorist attack. We wrap our selves up in the notion of well if it saves a life it is worth it. Bull crap. These people are at war with us and the desire to kill is isdeep in theyre soul. Peoe are going to die and invading my cell phone isnt the answer. Man we are turning into a nation of cowatd ass sissies. Grow freaking pair and kill these scumnags or accept that they will kill us butteying to micromanage every case through taking away all american liberties is chickencrap excuse for law enforcement to have gestapo like comtrol of us
|
|
|
Post by keith on Feb 20, 2016 18:44:50 GMT -5
I'm going to side with Richard on this. In the profession of arms it could produce actionable intelligence and I like having all we can get. When you place yourself in the enemy category (foreign or domestic) you forfeit certain things. Hell, I gave up portions of my rights to guarantee yours. I'm a strict Constitutionalist and don't think this request is unreasonable. Open that phone and explore the rat trail. How else do you imagine this sort of work gets done?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2016 18:46:08 GMT -5
I'm going to side with Richard on this. In the profession of arms it could produce actionable intelligence and I like having all we can get. When you place yourself in the enemy category (foreign or domestic) you forfeit certain things. Hell, I gave up portions of my rights to guarantee yours. I'm a strict Constitutionalist and don't think this request is unreasonable. Open that phone and explore the rat trail. How else do you imagine this sort of work gets done?Covertly
|
|
|
Post by keith on Feb 20, 2016 18:59:28 GMT -5
Most certainly it does but the point is that someone always follows the rat trail and someone else is waiting for a call to swing the hammer. That's how this is done and is why we are successful. It's called social contract and your ancestors decided it was good for you and you'd likely agree if you had to go back to defending yourself on the reg as many others do or have elsewhere or at other times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2016 19:20:16 GMT -5
Most certainly it does but the point is that someone always follows the rat trail and someone else is waiting for a call to swing the hammer. That's how this is done and is why we are successful. It's called social contract and your ancestors decided it was good for you and you'd likely agree if you had to go back to defending yourself on the reg as many others do or have elsewhere or at other times. Agreed
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 20, 2016 19:27:29 GMT -5
OK, if you saw the news tonight, there is a guy (don't remember his name or back ground but apparently well regarded) who claims he get the information from THAT phone and that phone alone. He will take the phone apart and using "whatever technologies" get the information............He guarantees it or he will eat his shoes on TV! This is seriously being contemplated by the FBI who desperately want that information. Which his method, there will be no BACK DOOR !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2016 21:00:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hawghunter on Feb 21, 2016 10:35:26 GMT -5
Like Beans, I'm on the fence concerning this. Upon hearing about the court order and Apple's fight against it, I wondered why the FBI didn't go about it differently, and later heard that others wondered the same thing. Why didn't/don't they just get an order for an agent supervised method of Apple personnel work to unlock the phone? The FBI could get their information and Apple could keep the I-phone security in tact? Everyone then should be happy, right? Probably not...... The I-phone has become a favorite of "bad guys" (and gals) all over the world because of its functions AND security. All the "good guys" fighting the "bad guys" would love having a program to unlock the phones' security codes! The FBI would get intense pressure to "share" such a program, and sooner or later it would be shared. Sooner or later the hackers would get their hands on such a program, and security would be lost. Agreed. Build the darned wall as was promised to Reagan in the '80's! Cut all federal funding (our tax dollars) supporting the illegals.....many would just leave. No need for another billions of dollars govt program to round up illegals...just deport them when they are found by local LE's. Other than outrageous government regulations, the illegals are the greatest drain on our economy, and they are becoming a serious threat to our security, almost as great as our present POTUS. All that needs to be done is make it a felony plus huge fines to employ an illegal alien. Throw a bunch of these employers in with the general prison population and publicize the results. If there is no work and no public assistance there will be no reason to come here. Kind of like the warning shot theory, shoot the first one and that's warning to all the rest.
|
|
|
Post by GMB54-120 on Feb 25, 2016 22:27:01 GMT -5
The owners of THAT phone gave the FBI permission to retrieve the data.
I don't see the problem.
|
|
|
Post by itneverends22 on Feb 26, 2016 9:30:26 GMT -5
The owners of THAT phone gave the FBI permission to retrieve the data. I don't see the problem. oh, then the (the owners) must have the passcode.. I thought the terrorist owned the phone..
|
|