|
Post by kai on Aug 15, 2016 1:27:45 GMT -5
I've been reloading for over 40 years on and I've limited my charges in the past to the maximum recommended charges listed in various reloading manuals. I'd like to maximize the velocities from some rifle cartridges and would know how to determine the maximum powder charges.
Scenario 1: New wildcat cartridge with no loading data: A new wildcat cartridge that will be used my first Thompson Center encore rifle.
Scenario 2: 270 Win: I'd like to develop maximum velocity with a 130 gn. Cutting Edge CNC machined solid copper bullet with a BC of 0.540. The published max load by Honardy for the Hybrid 100V powder is achieving 3,120 muzzle velocity. The max load of 56 grains is not compressed and it will easily accept a few more grains of powder.
How can the 270 WSM and 270 Win Ackley Improved cartridges achieve more power than the standard 270 Win cartridge without having excessive pressure? Do they somehow generate more velocity without increasing pressure, or are they allowing the pressures to be higher than allowed with the 270 Win standard cartridge?
What are some methods for determining maximum powder charges and avoiding excessive pressures?
|
|
|
Post by kskaggs on Aug 19, 2016 14:02:08 GMT -5
I have always looked at primer and case head expansion and of course sticky bolt. As far as the different 270 cartridges you listed from what I have read it deals with the powder column the short fat powder column burns different than a long skinny one hence the different pressures. Again from what I understand.
|
|
|
Post by kai on Aug 19, 2016 16:40:53 GMT -5
I have always looked at primer and case head expansion and of course sticky bolt. As far as the different 270 cartridges you listed from what I have read it deals with the powder column the short fat powder column burns different than a long skinny one hence the different pressures. Again from what I understand. Thanks for your comments. I never thought about the difference in burnout a larger powder column and a smaller one. I was thinking that a larger chamber diameter like WSM cartridges would generate more total pressure at any given psi a smaller 270 Win chamber. Pressure times area equals total pressure. Does anyone know how pressure traces are obtained?
|
|
|
Post by kai on Aug 19, 2016 16:59:14 GMT -5
I have always looked at primer and case head expansion and of course sticky bolt. As far as the different 270 cartridges you listed from what I have read it deals with the powder column the short fat powder column burns different than a long skinny one hence the different pressures. Again from what I understand. Thanks for your comments. I never thought about the difference in burn from a larger powder column and a smaller one. I was thinking that a larger chamber diameter like 270 WSM cartridges would generate more total pressure at any given psi than a smaller 270 Win chamber. Pressure times area equals total pressure. I'm trying to understand why a WSM can be loaded to shoot faster than a standard 270 Win. And if a 270 win could be loaded with more that the published maximum loads. Does anyone know how actual pressure is measured or how pressure traces are obtained?
|
|